These phrases help you manage the conversation itself — entering, disagreeing, and checking understanding. Try to use at least one in each discussion.
- "Can I jump in here?"
- "Sorry to interrupt, but…"
- "Building on what you said…"
- "That actually reminds me…"
- "I see your point, but…"
- "I'm not sure I agree — for me…"
- "That may be true, although…"
- "I'd push back on that a little…"
- "Do you mean that…?"
- "Sorry — are you saying…?"
- "What I mean is…"
- "Let me rephrase that…"
You will watch a short clip of a young person speaking to camera about the stay-vs-leave decision. Watch and then do these tasks in English:
Reflect on Video. What are three feelings the person expressed? Write them out in English.
Two key words:
Listen for: (1) an argument for staying or leaving, and (2) how they express certainty or doubt.
One argument:
One language feature:
"I've been thinking about this a lot lately. I'm from a small town in Junín — my whole family is still there. I finished my degree in Huancayo and then… I don't know. I got a job offer in Lima and I said yes. I told myself it was temporary. That was four years ago. And I think about it all the time. My mom asks when I'm coming back. My little brother is finishing school next year and I know he's going to face the same choice I did. And honestly? I don't know what to tell him. Part of me thinks he should leave — there's just so much more out here. But another part of me thinks — who's going to be left? Who builds the place if everyone like us keeps going? I don't have an answer. I think about it every day."
Same two tasks apply. After first reading: "One word — what does this person feel?" After second: "What argument do you notice? How do they express uncertainty?"
- 1Did you face a choice between staying in your hometown and moving somewhere larger? What factors most influenced your decision — or what factors would influence it today?
- 2Think of a former student who left the region. Think of one who stayed. Who do you think made the better choice — or is it even fair to compare them?
- 3Is there a difference between leaving for economic reasons and leaving for personal ambition? Does the reason change how you feel about it morally?
- 4What would need to change in your region for a talented 25-year-old to choose to stay — not out of obligation, but because it genuinely seemed like the best option?
Your teacher will assign you Group A or Group B. Read your card, identify your 3 strongest arguments. You can create your own unique arguments as well--items not found in the list below. Work with a partner from the other group (arguing the other side) to discuss the issue and make your arguments.
First 4 minutes: argue your assigned position as strongly as you can. Then drop the role and discuss what you actually think.
- Rural communities lose their best talent precisely when they need it most
- Schools, hospitals, and universities in rural areas desperately need qualified staff
- Lima is already overcrowded — internal migration creates urban poverty, not just rural poverty
- Entrepreneurship and remote work now make it possible to build a strong career locally
- Social capital — family networks, trust, deep community ties — is worth more than a higher salary
- Who will teach the next generation if all the teachers leave?
- Cultural identity and ancestral knowledge are lost when educated youth become fully urban
- Professional development and career advancement rarely exist in rural areas
- Salaries in Lima can be 3–4× higher for the same work — this matters for families
- Young people have the right to pursue the best opportunities available, wherever they are
- Migrants send remittances home — often greater economic impact than staying on a low local salary
- Urban experience builds leaders who may later return with more skills, capital, and networks
- Staying in a limited environment can produce frustration, resentment, and underperformance
- Brain drain is the government's responsibility to fix — not a burden individuals must carry alone
Circle your position (1 = strongly disagree → 5 = strongly agree). Be ready to explain your choice in one sentence.
Expressing a Strong View
- "There's a strong argument that …"
- "I'm firmly convinced that …"
- "This is, for me, a question of …"
- "I don't think it's fair to say that …"
- "The evidence clearly suggests …"
Qualifying and Softening
- "That may be true, but we also have to consider …"
- "It depends entirely on …"
- "I used to think that, but now I'm less sure …"
- "It's not as simple as saying …"
- "I feel torn on this because …"
Interaction Moves ★NEW
- "Can I jump in here?"
- "I see your point, but …"
- "Do you mean that …?"
- "Building on what you said…"
- "Let me rephrase that…"
You have 3 minutes to prepare, then 90 seconds to deliver. This is your chance to consolidate everything from today's lesson into one clear, sustained statement.
Your prompt:
"Should talented young people in rural Peru stay in their communities or move to larger cities — and why? What one change would most change your answer?"
Your notes (3 min preparation):
After today's lesson, write a few sentences in response to one of these prompts.
Choose one:
- → Describe a moment when you felt torn or conflicted about staying in or leaving your community.
- → Describe one specific change that would make your province significantly more likely to retain talented young people.
- → If a student asked you today: "Should I stay or move to Lima?" — what would you tell them, and why?